The great firewall of China: Xi Jinping’s internet
Proponents of controlling content on the internet claim that innocent children who become preys of predators waiting to engage young kids in child pornography and other malicious acts that can be made possible via the internet are given protection. With this, violators will be punished and lesser children will be victims. 2. May 07, 2018 · Rongbin Han argues that the Chinese government recognises it cannot possibly control all of the internet, so instead it engages in a ‘porous censorship’ that targets the most sensitive content. In 2010, the FCC enacted rules designed to maintain an Open Internet. Reclassification of the Internet would change that and could possibly open the door to future changes that might include fees and taxation. At the very least, reclassification would put the Internet in the U.S. directly under governmental control. This provides flexibility to adapt to a constantly changing world while preventing governmental or non-governmental actors from controlling the design of the network or the content it carries. Yet despite its success in even stark economic times, some foreign governments see the Internet as a threat, a cash cow, or both. Aug 01, 2013 · Common to all three is a drastic increase the authority and control the federal government would have over the Internet and the information that resides in it should there be any vaguely defined attack on any vaguely defined critical U.S. information assets. Groups like the Solid Liberals, Faith and Family Left, and the Next Generation Left believe that the government controlling gun ownership should be implemented due to the increase of mass shootings. However, groups that are far right, the Young Outsiders, Business Conservatives, and Steadfast Conservatives, believe that by restricting gun Dec 15, 2014 · PURPOSE OF CONTROLLING INTERNET The intention is to maintain: Security Stability Resiliency Along with its openness. 8. PUBLIC OPINION ON CONTROL OF INTERNET FOR AGAINST 74% of Internet Users world says that the Govt. should not control the Internet because; Social network helps the people to comment on the various social issues.
'Net neutrality' is a scheme to institute government control of the Internet under the guise of 'equal treatment.'
Mar 12, 2020 U.S. Government Does Not Control Internet Or Privacy - by We Americans love the Internet and our privacy. That the former diminishes the latter we rarely care to consider. That the federal government controls neither is both a blessing and a curse. Balancing privacy rights with the government’s interest in using the Internet to fight terrorism and crime requires delicacy.
Government control of Net is always a bad idea. Whether it's the California Public Utilities Commission or the United Nations, traditional governments are ill-suited to regulate the Internet.
Sep 24, 2015 · The Internet has only exacerbated this problem by making it so easy to communicate with the public. Not long after President Obama arrived in office, his administration carried out an audit of Jul 14, 2014 · His simple statement acts as a dog whistle to regulators, telling them to sweep everything about the Internet under the government-controlled net neutrality umbrella— technical operations The physical network that carries Internet traffic between different computer systems is the Internet backbone. In the early days of the Internet, ARPANET served as the system's backbone. Today, several large corporations provide the routers and cable that make up the Internet backbone. These companies are upstream Internet Service Providers Internet governance is the development and application by Governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programmes that shape the evolution and use of the Internet. The FCC's Restoring Internet Freedom Order, which took effect on June 11, 2018, provides a framework for protecting an open Internet while paving the way for better, faster and cheaper Internet access for consumers. It replaces unnecessary, heavy-handed regulations that were developed way back in 1934 with strong consumer protections, increased transparency, and common-sense rules that will